In June 2016
severe weather events struck parts of NSW and Tasmania, characterised by the
loss of several human lives, flash flooding, coastal erosion and
considerable damage to coastal structures, including homes. Animals also suffered, as did people close
to them, connected emotionally, economically, or in both ways. Sheep, cattle, bananas and even two horses in Western Sydney, used by disabled people died (one horse used by the disabled was rescued).
Some
climate scientists still propose that no single event can be attributed to
climate change, but an increasing number (including Kevin Trenberth) reverse the argument, pointing
out that the climate is in a new state, and all such events are
influenced by the hotter wetter atmosphere.
Irrespective
of their case, we know that the sea level is rising and its rate of increase is
accelerating, as oceans warm and expand and as ice melts. Only very aggressive climate
action can save parts of many of the world’s coastal cities from inundation by
century’s end (including Miami, New York and New Orleans). Unfortunately, sea level rise is far from the end of the problems we face.
As I wrote in an article ("Sounding the alarm: health in the Anthropocene") currently under review:
"Two recent papers and a commentary warn that parts of the Middle East and North Africa, especially near the Persian Gulf will become virtually uninhabitable under some plausible climate change scenarios by 2100, due to the combination of rising temperatures and humidity. Another, led by the director of the Max Planck center for chemistry in Germany, anticipates that:
Australian non-leadership
Following the
Sydney storm, NSW Emergencies Services Minister, the Hon David Elliott was
asked on News Radio if he
thought there might be a pattern emerging. After all, the world has recently
experienced drought, fires, other floods, heatwaves, unusual lightning, coral
bleaching, marine heatwaves..
Mr Elliott,
who in 2012 attempted to ridicule Climate Councilor Tim Flannery about climate
change (see facebook post to right), evaded the question, replying that he is “no
weatherman” (listen at the 4 minute mark).
It is good that some in the media are finally raising the issue of climate change at the time
of the latest tragedy, but lamentable that people in high office with a duty of
care to lead on this issue (including Barnaby Joyce the temporary Australian Federal
Minister for Agriculture) somehow think their background as a lawyer or
an accountant qualifies them to understand the science better. What is the point
of publicly funding science if that advice is then regarded with contempt
by our "leaders"?
Mr Elliott
has a background in the army and as a peacekeeper. Encouragingly, many in
the military are connecting the dots between climate change, ethnic divisions,
population growth and conflict.
But evasion such as his is not good enough. We instead need genuine leadership such as from UNFCCC Executive Secretary Christiana Figueres to slow the rate of climate
change. Its current trajectory, unchecked, will ruin the health and
well-being of our entire species. If we take the Paris Climate
Agreement seriously we might yet rescue civilisation. But as Kevin Anderson has
repeatedly pointed out, it too contains considerable wishful thinking. We
thus need real leadership, at all levels, but especially the top.
No comments:
Post a Comment